2012 Dodge Challenger R/T Review

challenger 2

Seeing how the market reacted to the Chevrolet Camaro and the Ford Mustang in the 1960s, Dodge went to work at developing a rival. In late 1969, the Dodge Challenger and its twin, the Plymouth Barracuda were introduced. Their advantage over the aforementioned Camaro and Mustang was that they both could be ordered in numerous trims and options with any engine from Chrysler’s lineup (Dodge and Plymouth are owned by Chrysler). Plymouth positioned the Barracuda against the Camaro and the Mustang while the Challenger rivaled luxury muscle cars such as the Mercury Cougar and Pontiac Firebird. It sold well but there was one caveat: timing. These two muscle cars rose to prominence as the muscle car segment declined, not to mention there was the oil crisis shortly after. Discontinued in 1974, the Challenger was revived not as a muscle car, but as a rebadged Mitsubishi Galant Lambda. Unsurprisingly, this Challenger was discontinued in 1983. As the 2004 Ford Mustang restarted the pony war, Dodge revived the Challenger. This time, it would stay true to the 1970s Challengers and Barracudas.

challenger 10challenger 1 challenger 4

There is no denying the fact that the Challenger successfully pays homage to the 1970s generation. The differences lie in the details. The recessed headlights and a mesh grille give the front a menacing look while the bumper design is simple. The stripes on the side, the gas cap, and the upward kink in the window line are nice retro touches. The full width taillight is a throwback detail, and it nicely accentuates the rear. To sum up, it is a handsome car with enough classic cues but still looks modern. The interior however is disappointing. It is appealing enough, but it is a generic Chrysler/Dodge interior. Considering the classically influenced exterior, I would have expected the interior to share some resemblance with the 1970s Challengers.

challenger interior

It definitely feels like a 1970s muscle car when it comes to the driving experience. The steering communicates very little road feel to the driver, and it is slow to respond. You have to turn the wheel more than you expect in order for the car to actually turn. In corners, the Challenger’s weight and steering conspire against it. Body lean is restrained, but it understeers easily. The tradeoff for lack of agility is a very comfortable ride. You really cannot feel bumps or road imperfections at all except for the occasional jarring on poor roads.

challenger 7 challenger 6

The R/T comes with a 375 horsepower 5.7 liter V8 engine. This Hemi V8 engine (Hemi engines are Chrysler/Dodge V8s but with a hemispherical combustion chamber) provides muscular performance. Its torque is spread so evenly that you never really feel that you need to downshift for more power. Off the line, the V8 belies the Challenger’s bulk. It does not rev very high, but it is not a problem since it offers impressive flexibility. The six speed manual transmission is smooth although the shifter’s odd placement (It is angled towards the driver) can take some time getting used to. The clutch is heavy and the numbness means it can be hard to tell where the engagement point is. A six speed automatic transmission is standard but trust me, the manual transmission is a much better match for this V8.

challenger gear shifter

challenger logo

The Challenger is surprisingly quiet, but you would not be able to tell because of the audible V8. The V8 never really stays quiet. It has a throaty growl that can either scare you or excite you. challenger 5 challenger 3

With the 2011 update, the fit and finish is considerably improved compared to pre-2011 models.  The soft touch dash and stitching on the seats outline a nicely finished interior. The shifter and the steering wheel feel lovely to hold. The controls are simple to use, and the touch screen works well. When you sit in the seat, you notice how soft and cushy the seats are. It is hard to get comfortable as it is a pain to adjust the lumbar support. For such a big car, the cabin feels snug and confining. Visibility is poor in the rear due to the huge pillars. The rear seat is surprisingly spacious for a coupe. The trunk is roomy as well.

challenger 8

Out of the Camaro, Mustang, and the Challenger, the Challenger stays true to the original the best. Sure, its handling may not be up to par, and visibility is horrible. But then again,95% of the population use a car just to commute. And that is where the Challenger succeeds. It can be fun too thanks to its powerful V8 and manual transmission. Whereas the Camaro is too modern and gimmicky and the Mustang too old fashioned, the Challenger strikes a decent balance. If you want the most practical muscle car on the market but do not place much emphasis on driving dynamics, the Challenger is a sound choice.

challenger 9

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 thoughts on “2012 Dodge Challenger R/T Review

  1. google.com says:

    This is my first time visit at here and i am truly impressed to
    read all at single place.

  2. […] architecture that underpinned many Holden vehicles. After reviewing a Mustang, and a Challenger, I was anxious to review a Camaro. However, you may remember that I will refuse to review a car […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: